The Cornerstone Speech And The Thomas Nast s Cartoon

The cornerstone speech and the Thomas Nast’s cartoon The American Civil War erupted in 1861 due to the constitutional and ideological differences between the Northern and the Southern states. The North advocated for equality and protection of human rights. On the other hand, the South considered the white to be more equal than the blacks. There are two historical documents that bring out the picture of the United States during the 1860s. The documents are the cornerstone speech by Alexander H. Stephens and the editorial cartoon by Thomas Nast that depict the inauguration of President Lincoln on 23rd, March 1861. The documents bring out the racial and gender-based prejudice that was rampant in the American society during the 19th century. Stephens’s speech provided the principles of the Confederacy state that were in contrast to the policies of the Union.. Thomas Nast editorial cartoon shows the reaction of the North and South to the election of President Lincoln. The South despised Lincoln since he was against slavery. The cornerstone of the Confederacy According to Alexander H. Stephens, the cornerstone of the Confederacy was slavery. Stephens believed that the white were more superior to the blacks and deserved better privileges. It was the natural and moral right of the white to be superior and the black to be inferior. He considered slavery to be a natural and moral condition. Stephens was a strong advocate of slavery in America. The Southern States of America supportedShow MoreRelatedSlavery And The American Civil War1125 Words   |  5 Pagesrole in the origins of the Civil War. The origins of the Civil War can also be attributed to the political, economical, social, and cultural differences between the North and South during the 1800s. The Cornerstone Speech by Alexander Stephens, Vice President of Confederacy, and the Nast’s cartoon of President Lincoln’s inaugural allow historians to gain a deeper understanding about the causes of the Civil War, and also allow historians to learn how the differences between t he North and South led

Anti Drug Abuse Act Of 1986 - 1591 Words

On June 17th 1971, President Richard Nixon stood in front of congress and announced his widely criticized War on Drugs. The President claimed that drugs were the â€Å"Public Enemy Number One† among Americans. Fast-forward to 1986, Congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. This act placed mandatory minimum sentences on minor drug infractions. The war on drugs not only incarcerated a very high number of Blacks, but also tore families apart in an effort to clean up neighborhoods which still affect many African American families almost a half-century later. In October 1982, President Ronald Reagan addressed the nation and promised a â€Å"planned, concerted campaign against all drugs, hard soft or otherwise.† The President had two ways he to†¦show more content†¦As clear bias law, this plan untimely laid the frame work for what we now know as the term â€Å"mass incarceration†. As a result of these drug laws the use of drugs decreased slightly, but the number of African American men incarcerated for drug crimes skyrocketed to more than 300 %, The number of African Americans arrested for drug abuse went from 112,784 to 452,574 in a short period of time. Young African American males were almost 9 times more likely to be incarcerated than their Caucasian counterparts. With considerably long sentence, and having to serve out a minimum of 85% of their time, these men have absolutely nothing to turn to. No longer was the goal of the penal system to reform these misguided men. Now the main priority of the prison system was to punish. Instead of giving these men a basic education, and helping them become productive members of society once they were released, Congress cut funding to educational programs, and actually tried to pass an act known as the No Frills Prison Act, which funded prisons to â€Å"prevent luxurious conditions.† To make things worse, Sou th Carolina prisons banned basic necessities out of spite,such as the air conditioners. The war on drugs not only effected the prisoners, but it also caused a grave hardship on their families as well. Nearly 2.7 million children admitted to having a parent who is currently incarnated, with the vast majority being nonviolent drug offenses. One out of every

Behavioral Change Rubbing Snuff Free Essays

Rubbing snuff, like other forms of tobacco use, is an addictive behavior that poses a serious challenge to individuals who want to change their habits. Perhaps an even greater challenge looms for those whose partners would like to change their behaviors! Paul’s habit of rubbing snuff is the ideal opportunity to enact a well-planned behavior plan intended to motivate lasting change. The specific targeted overt behavior is the act of swallowing tobacco juice. We will write a custom essay sample on Behavioral Change: Rubbing Snuff or any similar topic only for you Order Now To understand this behavior, it’s important to consider the dimensions of the broader act of rubbing snuff. The frequency of Paul’s dipping is estimated around 5-8 times per day with the frequency of swallows much greater. Dipping is described as replacing or adding additional tobacco to the mouth. Intensity increases with the progression of the day, starting with smaller amounts in the upper lip and ending with larger quantities in the lower lip by nighttime. The intensity of swallowing also rises with this increase in use. The duration of Paul’s tobacco use holds the greatest possibility for change. At baseline, he dips constantly from the moment of waking to seconds before retiring to bed. The latency of Paul’s dipping of additional interest in the development of an intervention. At baseline, he began dipping approximately 2. 5 seconds after opening his eyes in the morning. The latency of Paul’s first swallow of tobacco averages approximately 2 minutes after waking. The action of concern, swallowing of tobacco juice, is a behavior excess. Any swallowing greater than 0 times per day qualifies as the presence of this behavior in excess. The intervention selected to extinguish Paul’s swallowing behavior was the use of a pop bottle for spitting. Paul established a reasonable goal of less than 3 swallows per day for one week followed by less than 2 the next week. This decreasing trend would continue for several weeks until complete extinction is achieved. With the decrease in swallowing, it will be important to document the increase in spitting behavior. Paul will document the number of times he spits for two 30 minute intervals throughout the day. As he begins changing his behavior, it is hoped that increased spitting will aid the decrease in swallowing. A few ground rules will also be established to enforce the intervention. Paul should have his spit bottle, spittoon, and/or other spitting place on hand wherever he goes throughout the day. Along with targeting the decrease of swallowing tobacco juice, this intervention should also serve to increase the behavior of spitting. The reaction of poor Paul’s wife to this change is yet to be determined! The effectiveness of this intervention was assessed on a daily and then weekly basis. By the third week, Paul experienced complete swallowing cessation and had increased his frequency of spitting from relatively nothing to dozens of times a day. The result was the elimination of vomiting behavior, a perceived increase in energy, and self-reported decreases in fatigue. According to subjective and objective reports, Paul accomplished significant behavioral change. To improve the likelihood Paul would maintain his behavioral change, one final reporting and documentation measure was used two months after the start of the intervention. Hidden cameras were placed in Paul’s home and place of work to record each and every time he demonstrated the primary target behavior (swallowing tobacco juice) and the secondary desired replacement behavior (spitting in the bottle). The results were encouraging. Paul had completely stopped swallowing, but had also decreased the frequency of his need to spit throughout the day. With careful review, this was related to a decrease in duration of Paul’s dipping habit during the day. Paul was on his way to rubbing snuff out of his life! How to cite Behavioral Change: Rubbing Snuff, Papers Behavioral Change Rubbing Snuff Free Essays Rubbing snuff, like other forms of tobacco use, is an addictive behavior that poses a serious challenge to individuals who want to change their habits. Perhaps an even greater challenge looms for those whose partners would like to change their behaviors! Paul’s habit of rubbing snuff is the ideal opportunity to enact a well-planned behavior plan intended to motivate lasting change. The specific targeted overt behavior is the act of swallowing tobacco juice. We will write a custom essay sample on Behavioral Change: Rubbing Snuff or any similar topic only for you Order Now To understand this behavior, it’s important to consider the dimensions of the broader act of rubbing snuff. The frequency of Paul’s dipping is estimated around 5-8 times per day with the frequency of swallows much greater. Dipping is described as replacing or adding additional tobacco to the mouth. Intensity increases with the progression of the day, starting with smaller amounts in the upper lip and ending with larger quantities in the lower lip by nighttime. The intensity of swallowing also rises with this increase in use. The duration of Paul’s tobacco use holds the greatest possibility for change. At baseline, he dips constantly from the moment of waking to seconds before retiring to bed. The latency of Paul’s dipping of additional interest in the development of an intervention. At baseline, he began dipping approximately 2. 5 seconds after opening his eyes in the morning. The latency of Paul’s first swallow of tobacco averages approximately 2 minutes after waking. The action of concern, swallowing of tobacco juice, is a behavior excess. Any swallowing greater than 0 times per day qualifies as the presence of this behavior in excess. The intervention selected to extinguish Paul’s swallowing behavior was the use of a pop bottle for spitting. Paul established a reasonable goal of less than 3 swallows per day for one week followed by less than 2 the next week. This decreasing trend would continue for several weeks until complete extinction is achieved. With the decrease in swallowing, it will be important to document the increase in spitting behavior. Paul will document the number of times he spits for two 30 minute intervals throughout the day. As he begins changing his behavior, it is hoped that increased spitting will aid the decrease in swallowing. A few ground rules will also be established to enforce the intervention. Paul should have his spit bottle, spittoon, and/or other spitting place on hand wherever he goes throughout the day. Along with targeting the decrease of swallowing tobacco juice, this intervention should also serve to increase the behavior of spitting. The reaction of poor Paul’s wife to this change is yet to be determined! The effectiveness of this intervention was assessed on a daily and then weekly basis. By the third week, Paul experienced complete swallowing cessation and had increased his frequency of spitting from relatively nothing to dozens of times a day. The result was the elimination of vomiting behavior, a perceived increase in energy, and self-reported decreases in fatigue. According to subjective and objective reports, Paul accomplished significant behavioral change. To improve the likelihood Paul would maintain his behavioral change, one final reporting and documentation measure was used two months after the start of the intervention. Hidden cameras were placed in Paul’s home and place of work to record each and every time he demonstrated the primary target behavior (swallowing tobacco juice) and the secondary desired replacement behavior (spitting in the bottle). The results were encouraging. Paul had completely stopped swallowing, but had also decreased the frequency of his need to spit throughout the day. With careful review, this was related to a decrease in duration of Paul’s dipping habit during the day. Paul was on his way to rubbing snuff out of his life! How to cite Behavioral Change: Rubbing Snuff, Papers

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 Compliance

Question: Describe about the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 Compliance. Answer: 1 (a). Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA) regulates the relationships between retailers, wholesalers, suppliers and consumers. It promotes fair competition and trading with sole objective of improving welfare of Australian citizens. BHP Billiton is multinational company involved in mining copper, gold, coal, iron and petroleum. It has headquarters in Melbourne. This company welcomes decisions by the government of Australia hence ready to adopt statutory regulations and policies. In doing so some strategies the company adopted are; Addressing Australias productivity challenge Defining objectives of Australias competition policy Addressing regulation undermining Australias productivity BHP Billiton is an international diversified resources company working in 26 countries around the world at 141 locations. It has operation history since 1895. With the high experience, they embrace the opportunity to contribute in the debate to initiate a review of Australias competition law and policy. It works to deliver bigger volume growth with available resources at a low cost per unit. They believe in competitive investment climate, hence outstanding infrastructure and assets. According to BHP Billiton, competition policy should recommend innovation, improvement to productivity, international Australian industry competitiveness; encourage competitive markets and productive investment in long-term projects. Government of Australia should refurbish its devotion to the guiding principle under the agreement to competition principles. Regulations that undermine competition and less production should be scrapped off. 1 (b). Addressing Australias productivity challenge Cool competitive investment climate is vital for any kind of business both large and small. Risk based competition policies in partisan with open competitive practice strengthens economies and societies. Well-regulated competitive atmosphere encourages venture into business hence increasing productivity of a nation. The more businesses venture into a certain field the higher the output. Defining objectives of Australias competition policy Improved innovation, competitive markets, long-term projects and resources, improves economy of a nation. Long term investments increases national income, create jobs, increase productivity and rise revenue generation for governments. Competitive markets determine output and pricing. Overpricing in this case ceases encouraging consumers to buy products that are affordable and pocket friendly. BHP Billiton has long term strong standing structures, long term investment and encourages innovation. Efficient and full capacity use of natural resources minimises cost per unit production hence more profitability. Addressing regulation undermining Australias productivity Thorough assessment of regulations, both existing and proposed can enhance Australias competitiveness magnetism for investments. BHP Billiton recognizes that the best part of the competitiveness and output defy rests are responsibilities of the industry itself. Nevertheless, governments should take action to heighten the countrys dynamic power. This can be done through creating an investment atmosphere that is global competitive and an able policy structure. 1 (c) For BHP Billiton to be fully engaged in competition law compliance, management should ensure provisions of competition and consumer law (CCL) Act 2010 are adhered to by the company. Understanding of competition law and its provisions helps to avoid anticompetitive habits in business strategies. Ensuring BHP Billiton is in good communication with ACCC can increase importance of the law and promote its compliance. This enables dialogues hence putting both institutions in a better position to understand each other. Though companies have a cultural way of ensuring competition law compliance, it would be better for BHP Billiton to try risk-based, four-step approach. This is because the approach is specially designed specific business risks. The four steps include risk identification, risk assessment, risk mitigation and review. Risk identification: point the main competition law risks affecting BHP Billitons operations. These usually vary according to the nature and size of the companys business. Risk assessment: look into the seriousness of realised risks and rate the as either low, medium and high. The company should identify workers in areas of high risk. Department of sales and marketing may fall under this category since they directly have contact with competitors. Risk mitigation: come up with procedures, policies training with intention that identified risks will not occur while making sure that the company is able to act upon them if they happen. Possibility of the occurrence of an identified risk might determine the action to take. Review: with strong commitment review above steps starting the risk identification to risk mitigation for BHP Billiton to be certain that it is compliant competent. Sometimes companies might decide to do compliance review outside their normal routine due to certain abrupt occasions. For example, when there is compliance law investigation or taking over another business. Various companies do this annually while some opt for frequent review basis. Commitment to competition law compliance should be exercised both in junior and senior levels. Proper application of competition rules will make BHP Billiton sustain good reputation to its existing and potential customers. Compliance to this law does not only benefit clients welfare but is also a way to keep the company at its best levels making it remain in the frontline while strengthening its competency. Both management and employees of BHP Billiton should take responsibility to compliance with the law. This way the company will be able to carry out its activities in a fair competitive atmosphere. References Andy Gibson, D. F., 2003. Business Law 2014. New York City: Pearson Higher Education AU. Ghidini, G., 2010. Innovation, Competition and Consumer Welfare in Intellectual Property Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Hossein Esmaeili, B. G., 2016. The Boundaries of Australian Property Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press,. John Duns, A. D. B. S., 2015. Comparative Competition Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Miller, R. V., 2016. Miller's Australian Competition and Consumer Law Annotated. , New York City : Thomson Reuters Australia, Limited. Nicole Morandin, J. S., 2011. Australian Competition and Consumer Legislation 2011. Macquarie: CCH Australia Limited,.